Posted on February 4, by Scott Alexander Philip Tetlock, author of Superforecastinggot famous by studying prediction.
Huggins This last of our three-part series examining the life and research of Jerald Tanner, focuses on the integrity Jerald brought to his research of Mormon historical documents. Sandra and Jerald Tanner J erald Tanner's research was always centered in determining the truth, not just uncovering problems in LDS claims.
Besides examining the church's own material, at times he found it necessary to examine the veracity of works that were critical of the LDS Church.
The latter source in addition had a tantalizing note to the effect that "apparently there are no copies of the original extant. This naturally represented a challenge to Jerald and Sandra's circle of friends to see if they could find an original copy. In late Pauline Hancock, pastor of the little Church of Christ in Independence, Missouri, received a letter from Susan Kallenbach of the Yale University Library's Western Americana Collection announcing that they had not the original itself but a copy of the original, which they were willing to photocopy or microfilm.
They stressed however that they had no information "as to the location of the original copy. Walters, fellow researcher and pastor of Practical book review of petersen text Presbyterian Church in Marissa, Illinois, had managed to trace the original from which the Yale copy was made to a certain Mr.
Fulk, who allowed him to examine it in his home. Walters was disappointed to discover that it was not an original but only made to look like one: Fulk's copy the page had been cut all the way across just above the word Defence. A blank piece of paper of the same quality as the rest of the title page was pasted above the word Defence.
I couldn't see the point of this until I returned home and checked [R. He sent a copy of the Cowdery Defence that he had somehow obtained possibly from the Tanners' tract to Yale and received a letter back from Archibald Hanna, curator of the Western American Collection, informing him that the copies he had sent were derived from the Yale copy, further noting that the Yale copy had been "photographed from a pasted up dummy," which suggested to Hanna that "the original may have appeared in a newspaper and that Cowdery decided to reprint it as a pamphlet and so pasted up a dummy and had a title page set for it.
In response Jerald made the question a matter of his own investigation, and on April 7,he and Sandra issued a tract entitled A Critical Look: A Study of the Overstreet "Confession" and the Cowdery "Defence"which set out to prove that the Defence, along with another document related to Cowdery that also placed the LDS Church in a bad light, were both forgeries.
Here we shall focus only on the Defence. In making his case against the Defence Jerald repeated many of the same concerns shared by Anderson and other early investigators, i.
But, as in most of his work, Jerald's most decisive argument was a literary one in which he proved, I believe beyond reasonable doubt, that the Defence had been cobbled-together from published Cowdery writings, especially from the series of letters he wrote on the history of the Church which appeared in the LDS newspaper Messenger and Advocate.
There are two legitimate reasons that authors may write similar things in different places.
The first is that everyone has his own distinctive style of writing, features of which show up consistently in whatever they write. It is also a common practice among writers when they write on a topic they have already covered to copy what they formerly said in a new work.
Jerald, however, discovered close parallels to Cowdery's writings that fit neither of these criteria. In his pamphlet Jerald focused only on the first: We compared all of these sources with the purported "Defence," and the results of this study are rather interesting.
In the letters found in the Huntington Library we found no parallels of any importance; likewise the History of the Church contained no significant parallels. In the Evening and Morning Star we found only one important parallel—i.
He concluded that "whoever wrote the 'Defence' used the Messenger and Advocate. Usually the motive for recopying something that you have written before is that the author has occasion to talk about the same topic again.
But what we find in the Defence are phrases and chunks of text taken out of one context and patched in to another, without there being any obvious connection between the two settings.practical book review one: petersen By Michael Vincent Paddy Student I.D.
Presented to Dwight C. Rice, D. Min. (Ph.D. Candidate) In partial fulfillment of the requirements of Introduction to Pastoral Counseling PACO Practical Book Review of Petersen Text Shakeya A. Haith Liberty University 18 November Summary Throughout this text James Petersen teaches us how to communicate better and actually understand one another/5(1).
The Monster Librarian Presents: Reviews of Zombie Fiction. Some are slow, some are attheheels.com are chatty, some moan, and some are dead silent the thing that they all have in common is that they are dead and would like you to join them for dinner.
Works deemed as being especially helpful for further study of the book of Revelation are emphasized.. Aland, Kurt and Bruce M. Metzger.
The Greek New attheheels.comart, Germany: German Bible Society. 2 references. “So as I said before, Superforecasting is not necessarily too useful for people who are already familiar with the cognitive science/rationality tradition, but great for people who need a high-status and official-looking book to justify it.”.
Read this essay on Practical Book Review of Petersen Text. Come browse our large digital warehouse of free sample essays. Get the knowledge you need in order to pass your classes and more.
Only at attheheels.com".