Not being specific enough leads to meaningless chatter and misunderstanding. If I have to ask several questions in order to understand what a person is saying and what their statement or comment meansthen the person giving that statement or comment either knows very little about what they are saying or they're trying to manipulate you.
Below our GED sample essay is a brief analysis justifying its perfect score. Police militarization is a hot-button topic these days. Some believe that criticizing the actions of the police hurts their ability to do their job, while others argue that the police are overstepping their authority and often cause more harm than good.
Both passages address this issue head on; however, the critique of police militarization published by the ACLU is the best-supported and ultimately the most convincing argument. While the second passage lacks specific statistical data, the ACLU states that there were 80, military raids by police last year.
This is surprising and supports the idea that military-style raids have become too commonplace in society.
The writer then highlights the inherent problem with these raids: Private companies are ultimately designed to make money, not help the police, so police militarization poses an ethical problem.
Readers, most likely taxpayers, have a vested interest in not having their money wasted by the government. Sample Essay Analysis This essay is very well-organized.
It uses 5 paragraphs and lays out the structure in the following manner: Both arguments are introduced, and the thesis is clearly placed at the end of the paragraph so they are easy for the reader to find.
The thesis clearly states which argument the author believes is better-supported, and the language is confident.
Each of the next three body paragraphs is well-organized, starting with transitional words or phrases and including at least one example that supports the thesis. The body paragraphs cite specific examples from the passage, and then explain how those examples support the overall argument.
The author uses three different examples: These diverse examples show that the author understands what makes an argument weak or strong.
Finally, the concluding paragraph makes a minor concession to the opposing side, praising the numbered list that appears therein, before reiterating the thesis from the Introduction.
The essay avoids any grammar or spelling errors and the sentence structure is clear and varied with the appropriate usage of commas and other punctuation. Clear command of the English language is demonstrated.
As a result, this essay would earn a perfect score.Diction Definition. Diction can be defined as style of speaking or writing, determined by the choice of words by a speaker or a writer. Diction, or choice of words, often separates good writing from bad writing.
It depends on a number of factors. The Purdue University Online Writing Lab serves writers from around the world and the Purdue University Writing Lab helps writers on Purdue's campus.
Students are asked to write literary analysis essays because this type of assignment encourages you to think about how and why a poem, short story, novel, or play was written.
To successfully analyze literature, you’ll need to remember that authors make specific choices for particular reasons.
Video: How Word Choice and Language Sets the Tone of Your Essay. you should be able to implement how word choice and language set the tone for our essay .
Related Documents: Essay on Diction: Writing and Diction A Midsummer Night ' s Dream and Witty Writing Strategies Essay You may be writing an essay to argue a point or to explain the steps to complete a task. If you follow a few simple steps, you will find that with practice, writing an essay can be easy to do.
The first step in the process.
If a single problem has vexed biologists for the past couple of hundred years, surely it concerns the relation between biology and physics. Many have struggled to show that biology is, in one sense or another, no more than an elaboration of physics, while others have yearned to identify a “something more” that, as a matter of fundamental principle, differentiates a tiger — or an amoeba.